Why is H. Pylori not cultured before giving antibiotic?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 6:32 am
Ever since I was diagnosed with H. Pylori, my GP and my Gastroenterologist have been giving me all these strong antibiotic therapies one after another. After a positive UBT, my GP prescribed me the standard Triple therapy (Nexium HP7). After 4 weeks another UBT shows still positive for H. Pylori. So, I was referred to a gastroenterologist who prescribed me the Quadraple therapy straight away(Clarythromycin/Doxycillin/Rifabutin/Pantoprazole)!
After finishing the Quadraple therapy, my gastroenterologist did an endoscopy. He took biopsy sample for histology. He also did a rapid Ureas test only to find out that I'm still positive. Three weeks later histology report shows "Sever Helicobacter gastritis with intestinal metaplasia". Surprisingly, he did not take any sample to culture the bacteria! Now he has prescribed me the Salvage therapy (Levofloxacin 1gm/Amoxycilling 2gms/Pantoprazole 80mg daily). So, I'm on my third course of therapy not knowing if this will actually work(?)
I've told you my treatment history because, to me, it just doesn't seem right the way my treatment is going. After the failure of the first treatment, they should have done a culture of the bacteria to find out the strain and then they should have prescribed me an effective antibiotic course.
So, my question is why doctors do not get a culture done to find the strain of the bacteria before prescribing those strong antibiotic courses, instead of throwing stones in the dark? Why do we not have a standard protocol of culturing the bacteria after the failure of the first treatment?
Antibiotics such as Rifabutin, Levovloxacin etc, as I understand, are trial medicine and we don't know yet what long term side effect(s) they will have on us. Somewhere in the forum I read that these antibiotics can cause diverticulitis in the long term. I understand the importance of eradicating H. Pylori but does it worth taking a shot in the dark?
After finishing the Quadraple therapy, my gastroenterologist did an endoscopy. He took biopsy sample for histology. He also did a rapid Ureas test only to find out that I'm still positive. Three weeks later histology report shows "Sever Helicobacter gastritis with intestinal metaplasia". Surprisingly, he did not take any sample to culture the bacteria! Now he has prescribed me the Salvage therapy (Levofloxacin 1gm/Amoxycilling 2gms/Pantoprazole 80mg daily). So, I'm on my third course of therapy not knowing if this will actually work(?)
I've told you my treatment history because, to me, it just doesn't seem right the way my treatment is going. After the failure of the first treatment, they should have done a culture of the bacteria to find out the strain and then they should have prescribed me an effective antibiotic course.
So, my question is why doctors do not get a culture done to find the strain of the bacteria before prescribing those strong antibiotic courses, instead of throwing stones in the dark? Why do we not have a standard protocol of culturing the bacteria after the failure of the first treatment?
Antibiotics such as Rifabutin, Levovloxacin etc, as I understand, are trial medicine and we don't know yet what long term side effect(s) they will have on us. Somewhere in the forum I read that these antibiotics can cause diverticulitis in the long term. I understand the importance of eradicating H. Pylori but does it worth taking a shot in the dark?